dan08 wrote:We all know what Rio meant when he used that word. He was obviously using the UK slang word and not the Jamaican one...
Whether he should be banned for it is another matter.
mikesiva wrote:Here's my issue...Rio should've got a warning for this - nothing more.
sussexpob wrote:That is utterly moronic and senseless babble. Women's sport is actively being discriminated against? Can you explain how so??
WSL average attendance...... 573 people per game
Women's Champions League Final.... 11,000 last year
Women's world cup final.... not a sell out despite wide marketing support
So we should give the WSL winners £21,000,000 because its fair? Just to let you know, the current 14 game/8 team format, in order just to generate that money through ticket sales to have that prize money amount to pay to a winner, and we are also talking in the fantasy world where all costs to the side don't exist, the ticket price for an average game would have to be £323. Not sure if you were charging that much money, you would get the incredibly high figure of 573 to each game.... Liverpool Ladies, the current dominant force in the WSL, charge £5.00 for the highest price ticket, £2.50 for the lowest. The bus to the ground costs more to see it, and still the numbers are low.
Assuming they get the average gate, paying £5, that's £20,055 income per year..... that wouldn't even pay a reserve team mans player for a week, or roughly what Luis Suarez was on a day. Can you tell me how the WSL expect to generate this prize money? Or do the FA have to pay 2,000 times the average season gate revenue just to make things equal?
Women don't earn as much because, lets not beat around the bush, NO ONE CARES AND NO ONE GOES TO GAMES!!!!
Its pure economics. To argue that rugby, cricket and football for women generates anywhere near the interest or money as the men's game is simple a lie, its not backed up by any reality.
sussexpob wrote:That is utterly moronic and senseless babble. Women's sport is actively being discriminated against? Can you explain how so??
WSL average attendance...... 573 people per game
Women's Champions League Final.... 11,000 last year
Women's world cup final.... not a sell out despite wide marketing support
So we should give the WSL winners £21,000,000 because its fair? Just to let you know, the current 14 game/8 team format, in order just to generate that money through ticket sales to have that prize money amount to pay to a winner, and we are also talking in the fantasy world where all costs to the side don't exist, the ticket price for an average game would have to be £323. Not sure if you were charging that much money, you would get the incredibly high figure of 573 to each game.... Liverpool Ladies, the current dominant force in the WSL, charge £5.00 for the highest price ticket, £2.50 for the lowest. The bus to the ground costs more to see it, and still the numbers are low.
Assuming they get the average gate, paying £5, that's £20,055 income per year..... that wouldn't even pay a reserve team mans player for a week, or roughly what Luis Suarez was on a day. Can you tell me how the WSL expect to generate this prize money? Or do the FA have to pay 2,000 times the average season gate revenue just to make things equal?
Women don't earn as much because, lets not beat around the bush, NO ONE CARES AND NO ONE GOES TO GAMES!!!!
Its pure economics. To argue that rugby, cricket and football for women generates anywhere near the interest or money as the men's game is simple a lie, its not backed up by any reality.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 46 guests