dan08 wrote:Lancs would also have won if the umpires gave Birmingham a 6 run penalty. Don't know why it wasn't awarded as they clearly went over the time limit.
Maybe they reckon Horton wasted a minute complaining.
dan08 wrote:Lancs would also have won if the umpires gave Birmingham a 6 run penalty. Don't know why it wasn't awarded as they clearly went over the time limit.
hopeforthebest wrote:The umpires said they 17 seconds over time but they started the game late so they were content.
The best team on the day won, starting by beating the pundits favourites and holding their nerve when it mattered.
captaincolly wrote:hopeforthebest wrote:The umpires said they 17 seconds over time but they started the game late so they were content.
The best team on the day won, starting by beating the pundits favourites and holding their nerve when it mattered.
Yeah, Warwickshire certainly deserved their victory.
Aidan11 wrote:captaincolly wrote:hopeforthebest wrote:The umpires said they 17 seconds over time but they started the game late so they were content.
The best team on the day won, starting by beating the pundits favourites and holding their nerve when it mattered.
Yeah, Warwickshire certainly deserved their victory.
Or Birmingham.
D/L wrote:Words fail me for once.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 13 guests