GarlicJam wrote:wow, that didn't last long. The move downwards has been a plummet.
bigfluffylemon wrote:I see Steyn has now been ruled out of the entire tournament.
Any chance I can pick a sub from now on, or is it tough luck?
Red Devil wrote:bigfluffylemon wrote:I see Steyn has now been ruled out of the entire tournament.
Any chance I can pick a sub from now on, or is it tough luck?
I think that's always been tough luck unfortunately! Normally happens to most of us!
ianp1970 wrote:To mitigate against such injuries, maybe moving forward we could do the scoring along the lines of:
Best 'X-1' players in an 'X' team competition?
So if the format had been used in this CWC: each posters highest scoring 9 players would have counted towards their total score.
Being a new format, I'm open to suggestions...
bigfluffylemon wrote:ianp1970 wrote:To mitigate against such injuries, maybe moving forward we could do the scoring along the lines of:
Best 'X-1' players in an 'X' team competition?
So if the format had been used in this CWC: each posters highest scoring 9 players would have counted towards their total score.
Being a new format, I'm open to suggestions...
I can see that being very complex to administer, as the 'highest scoring 9 players' may not be obvious given the multiplication factor - e.g. do you drop the player with the fewest runs, fewest wickets - what about an allrounder?
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 21 guests