County Fantasy Manager 2015

[Durhamfootman]

First defeat for the Wobblers, I reckon. Just couldn't cope with 12 wicket Mags, in the end. I was in a fairly good position, this morning, because I had 2 quality bowlers with whole innings to bowl, but sadly they didn't deliver the wickets, and not that many were even needed. The declaration by Worcs didn't help when I had a batsman in the runs and a bowler in the wickets. It was unfortunate that Gary Wilson was away with Ireland because the match ended up being so close that Foakes' 5 dismissals behind the stumps were the difference between winning and losing, but ultimately it was the managers fatal and surprising error to leave 8 wicket Raine on the bench, when he thought he'd including him, that ultimately cost his team the win. Well played to SP, his 10 men were better than my 11 in this match

[hopeforthebest]

Only 4 bowlers for me but they accumulated 16 wickets with the perrenial Shreck picking up 5 in the seconed innings. Onece again I left out big scoring batsmen but Faulkner, Burns and Klinger were on top form.
I feel sorry for CF90 as most of his best players were with the England squad. Improvement is on the way when, Bell, Woakes and maybe others play CC games.

[sussexpob]

First defeat for the Wobblers, I reckon. Just couldn't cope with 12 wicket Mags, in the end. I was in a fairly good position, this morning, because I had 2 quality bowlers with whole innings to bowl, but sadly they didn't deliver the wickets, and not that many were even needed. The declaration by Worcs didn't help when I had a batsman in the runs and a bowler in the wickets. It was unfortunate that Gary Wilson was away with Ireland because the match ended up being so close that Foakes' 5 dismissals behind the stumps were the difference between winning and losing, but ultimately it was the managers fatal and surprising error to leave 8 wicket Raine on the bench, when he thought he'd including him, that ultimately cost his team the win. Well played to SP, his 10 men were better than my 11 in this match

I have you a slight winner on runs scored

[Durhamfootman]

hold the front page..... I forgot Ben Brown's second innings 27, which I think gives me the win by the proverbial midges d1ck

16.18 -v- 15.95

of course I might have forgotten something else too.

whoever has won, there won't be many closer matches than this one

[ianp1970]

Update after Matchweek 7:









Spreadsheet link:

https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/15ubxBDHb_KX6HxURBvoUuv-MEtUBO_oxM4b3lCKlh1k/edit#gid=1756625699

Any errors, please let me know

[sussexpob]

Any errors, please let me know

Stuart Meaker took three wickets..... the RPW difference that DFM won by was less than a boundary..... approximately 0.15 runs per wicket difference

It was 10 v 11 too.... incredible really. Had Palladino not come in for one over at the end and scored 5 I would have won!!!

Less than a FRIGGING BOUNDARY

[ianp1970]

Any errors, please let me know

Stuart Meaker took three wickets..... the RPW difference that DFM won by was less than a boundary..... approximately 0.15 runs per wicket difference

It was 10 v 11 too.... incredible really. Had Palladino not come in for one over at the end and scored 5 I would have won!!!

Less than a FRIGGING BOUNDARY

Cheers, will amend

Very tight game in the end

[Durhamfootman]

really cheered me up that

made my day

sorry SP

the Wobblers march on

[ianp1970]

Matchweek 8 details:





I will amend the Google Docs shortly, teams in by first toss Sunday please

[hopeforthebest]

Ian, for crying out loud can't you post a simple table of points rather than these confusing tables of innumerable columns of carried forwards and ratios that mean nothing unless there's a tie on points at the end of the competition. I have no idea how many points I have from theses tables. If there is such a thing as too much information those tables prove it.

[ianp1970]

Ian, for crying out loud can't you post a simple table of points rather than these confusing tables of innumerable columns of carried forwards and ratios that mean nothing unless there's a tie on points at the end of the competition. I have no idea how many points I have from theses tables. If there is such a thing as too much information those tables prove it.

Like this?

[sussexpob]

Ian, for crying out loud can't you post a simple table of points rather than these confusing tables of innumerable columns of carried forwards and ratios that mean nothing unless there's a tie on points at the end of the competition. I have no idea how many points I have from theses tables. If there is such a thing as too much information those tables prove it.

Like this?

Perfect

[ianp1970]

Will do that one with the results and the link together on one post next time and the nerdy one separately

[ianp1970]

Google Docs updated

[hopeforthebest]

Ian, for crying out loud can't you post a simple table of points rather than these confusing tables of innumerable columns of carried forwards and ratios that mean nothing unless there's a tie on points at the end of the competition. I have no idea how many points I have from theses tables. If there is such a thing as too much information those tables prove it.

Like this?

Perfect

Wonderful ian, double perfect.