Cricket-Match-Special ... A forum for discussion

ntini77 wrote:Doesn't bode well that quite a few of my first 16 aren't even in their match day squads.

Do you have a website link that shows all the squads in one place?

Ian, doesn't really matter but just to note that the counties of my players are wrong on the latest link - must have got out of alignment somewhere

Red Devil wrote:Ian, doesn't really matter but just to note that the counties of my players are wrong on the latest link - must have got out of alignment somewhere

Will have a look when I do the update

ps. Good start for you from Gidman!

ianp1970 wrote:

ntini77 wrote:Doesn't bode well that quite a few of my first 16 aren't even in their match day squads.

Do you have a website link that shows all the squads in one place?

No, unfortunately I do not. I just check county sides official sites.

ianp1970 wrote:

Red Devil wrote:Ian, doesn't really matter but just to note that the counties of my players are wrong on the latest link - must have got out of alignment somewhere

Will have a look when I do the update

ps. Good start for you from Gidman!

awful start from my batters though - Bragg, Gale and Mustard all gone for a combined total of about 50

could be worse Red....... I dropped Lees from my side

I have about 7 players missing, but the good news is those withdrawals promoted Jennings who scored 80

he played really well for his 80 too. He's starting to look like a 'proper' opener, and has made a good start to the season (miles better than last year). He leaves anything wide of off, and plays with great patience. I think he's going to have a good year. He took a wicket too, last week, so it looks as though colly might be prepared to give him a few overs in the away matches.... maybe even a couple of overs at home, who knows? If I were you, I'd be tempted to just put him in the side and leave him there.

My team currently has over 300 runs and Ians has less than 30

problem is, he has taken about 12 wickets and I have 0

SaintPowelly wrote:My team currently has over 300 runs and Ians has less than 30

problem is, he has taken about 12 wickets and I have 0

To be fair, I think only Abbott and Smith have batted so far!

ianp1970 wrote:

SaintPowelly wrote:My team currently has over 300 runs and Ians has less than 30

problem is, he has taken about 12 wickets and I have 0

To be fair, I think only Abbott and Smith have batted so far!

and Ervine with Trego currently but yeah..I've only had Tremlett bowl, could be close though

Just as I was catching up,Darren Stevens starts bowling :/

SaintPowelly wrote:Just as I was catching up,Darren Stevens starts bowling :/

Are you scoring the game live Powelly?

ianp1970 wrote:

SaintPowelly wrote:Just as I was catching up,Darren Stevens starts bowling :/

Are you scoring the game live Powelly?

Yeah, its bad viewing.

I lead 336 + Dent to 64, but you have 17 wickets to my 3

SaintPowelly wrote:

ianp1970 wrote:

SaintPowelly wrote:Just as I was catching up,Darren Stevens starts bowling :/

Are you scoring the game live Powelly?

Yeah, its bad viewing.

I lead 336 + Dent to 64, but you have 17 wickets to my 3

So 19.7 v 21.3

That is close