dan08 wrote:I don't think you should get 10 points for having a strike rate of 80. Nothing special in the modern game. Also, bowlers need to be rewarded more for having a low economy rate. Having an economy below 4 is just as, if not more, valuable as having a batsman striking at 150.
hopeforthebest wrote:dan08 wrote:I don't think you should get 10 points for having a strike rate of 80. Nothing special in the modern game. Also, bowlers need to be rewarded more for having a low economy rate. Having an economy below 4 is just as, if not more, valuable as having a batsman striking at 150.
I think all the trike rates need some thought because most of the high rates are made by batsmen coming in late with licence to take risks. Maybe 100 S/R for a top order batsman should be equated to 150 S/R for a late order batsman.
Red Devil wrote:hopeforthebest wrote:dan08 wrote:I don't think you should get 10 points for having a strike rate of 80. Nothing special in the modern game. Also, bowlers need to be rewarded more for having a low economy rate. Having an economy below 4 is just as, if not more, valuable as having a batsman striking at 150.
I think all the trike rates need some thought because most of the high rates are made by batsmen coming in late with licence to take risks. Maybe 100 S/R for a top order batsman should be equated to 150 S/R for a late order batsman.
that's too complictaed. besides, someone batting athe top of the order has the opportunity to bat through the innings and score more from runs and bonuses for 50's and 100's - so it should sort of even out.
I agree that SR and ER needs looking at again given the evolution of the ODI game
D/L wrote:Words fail me for once.
hopeforthebest wrote:The problem with S/R's is that someone on 99.9 S/R gets 10 points less than someone on 100.1 S/R. Bonuses for boundaries would eliminate that yet still reward the fast scoring batsmen.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 43 guests